| 翻訳と辞書 |
| KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
''KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex, Inc.'', 550 U.S. 398 (2007), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the issue of obviousness as applied to patent claims.
==Case history==
Teleflex, Inc. sued KSR International, claiming that one of KSR's products infringed Teleflex's patent〔. "Adjustable pedal assembly with electronic throttle control", 2001-05-29〕 on connecting an adjustable vehicle control pedal to an electronic throttle control. KSR argued that the combination of the two elements was obvious, and the claim was therefore not patentable. The district court ruled in favor of KSR, but the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed in January 2005.
Oral arguments were heard by the Supreme Court on November 28, 2006. The petitioner, KSR, was represented by James W. Dabney. Deputy solicitor general Thomas G. Hungar represented the government, which sided with the petitioner. Thomas C. Goldstein argued on behalf of the respondent, Teleflex.〔(Oral Argument Transcript ), 2006-11-28〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|